After watching the clip again, I can see how maybe this wasn’t the best choice of scene since they do sound kind of similar, especially in the low-quality format produced by a converted YouTube video.įrom personal experience, I can say that with Zoom recordings it’s had greater success thus far in correctly identifying each speaker, though I still haven’t tried it on a meeting with more than two people. Unfortunately, it did struggle a bit with identifying the different speakers correctly. Not something you could copy verbatim into an article, but it’s an amazing head start compared to transcribing a recording yourself from scratch. The text results are pleasantly accurate. Oh, well, well, well, now who's being rude? What is the stupid thing you're carrying around? So, what are you, an artist or something? He's a rather good. You are rude and uncouth and presumptuous, and I am leaving now. And we are not having this conversation at all. Why can't you just answer the question? This is absurd. Do you love the guy or not? This is not a suitable conversation. And all the while I feel I'm standing in the middle of a crowded room screaming at the top of my lungs and no one even looks up. All of Philadelphia society will be there. He would have gone straight to the bottom. And the inertia of my life plunging ahead in me, powerless to stop it. It was my whole world and all the people in it.

What I was thinking was what could have happened to this girl to make her think she had no way out. What does she know about misery? No, no, it's not what I was thinking. Not just for for pulling me back, but for your discretion. Pretty good! The full text (not split by speaker) looks like: Jack. Amazon Transcription results | Image by Author.

Zoom transcribe meetings